Scott defends psychology against broad dismissals by showing that the replication crisis primarily affected only social priming within social psychology, while the vast majority of the field consists of solid, replicable research across many subdisciplines. Longer summary

Scott Alexander argues that the replication crisis has unfairly tarnished the entire field of psychology when it primarily affected only social psychology, and more specifically social priming research. He demonstrates this by walking through a standard intro psychology textbook, showing that 15 out of 16 chapters cover solid research areas like psychophysics, neuroscience, cognitive psychology, and clinical psychology, while only one chapter deals with the problematic social psychology subfield. He provides a long list of the diverse types of psychologists doing legitimate work, from those studying visual processing to those treating drug abuse, and emphasizes that bad research exists in all scientific fields, not just psychology. The post concludes by urging critics to be specific and target social priming rather than dismissing psychology as a whole. Shorter summary

Scott Alexander examines why therapy works for some people but not others, suggesting that individual differences in mental processes might explain its varying effectiveness. Longer summary

Scott Alexander explores the debate around the effectiveness of therapy, particularly supportive therapy. He acknowledges the wide range of opinions, from those who see therapy as a waste of money to those who find it incredibly beneficial. The post delves into the possible reasons for these differing views, suggesting that individual differences in mental processes might explain why therapy works for some but not others. Scott discusses examples of people lacking certain mental abilities that others take for granted, such as problem-solving skills or inner monologue, and speculates that these differences might influence therapy's effectiveness. He emphasizes that everyone likely has some deficiencies in basic human functioning, and that the variation in thought processes could explain the varying benefits people derive from therapy. Shorter summary