Scott Alexander presents evidence supporting the legitimacy of bisexual identity, explaining why many bisexuals primarily date the opposite sex despite genuine attraction to both. Longer summary

Scott Alexander discusses the common accusation that self-identified bisexuals are faking their sexuality for trendiness. He presents statistical and biological evidence to explain why bisexuals often end up in heterosexual relationships despite genuine attraction to both sexes. The post explores dating pool sizes, social pressures, and biological arousal patterns to support the legitimacy of bisexual identity. Scott argues that as social acceptance increases, more people recognize their bisexual tendencies, even if they primarily date the opposite sex. He concludes by relating this to the original question about bisexuality and Long COVID, suggesting a possible link through neurodivergence and increased self-awareness. Shorter summary

Scott Alexander compares reactions to coming out as gay versus disliking math, introducing the concept of a 'Things To Be Fascinated About Lottery' to explain diverse interests and talents. Longer summary

In this post, Scott Alexander compares people's reactions to someone coming out as gay versus someone expressing dislike for math. He argues that while people are generally accepting of sexual orientation, they often react negatively and dismissively to someone's lack of interest in math. Scott explores the concept of a 'Things To Be Fascinated About Lottery', suggesting that our interests and talents are largely determined by chance. He reflects on his own struggles with math and how he came to accept that intelligence isn't monolithic, and that people can have different strengths and weaknesses. The post concludes with the idea that while some interests may be more advantageous than others, we shouldn't blame ourselves for our natural inclinations. Shorter summary