Scott Alexander explains why 'doing something' about mentally ill homeless people is more complex than it seems, detailing current processes and challenges in implementing alternatives. Longer summary

Scott Alexander critiques the common call to 'do something' about mentally ill homeless people, explaining why seemingly simple solutions are often impractical or ineffective. He details the current process for dealing with disruptive mentally ill homeless individuals, highlighting its limitations and the numerous challenges in implementing alternative approaches. The post emphasizes the need for specific, well-thought-out plans rather than vague demands for action, and critiques articles that criticize 'soft' approaches without offering concrete, feasible alternatives. Shorter summary

Scott Alexander offers a detailed guide on navigating the inpatient mental health system, balancing caution with the importance of seeking necessary treatment. Longer summary

Scott Alexander provides a comprehensive guide on navigating the inpatient mental health system, covering topics from avoiding involuntary commitment to getting the best care possible when hospitalized. He discusses strategies for interacting with mental health professionals, understanding hospital procedures, and protecting one's rights. The post balances the need for caution with the importance of seeking necessary treatment, offering practical advice for patients and their loved ones. Shorter summary

Scott reviews a book arguing against deinstitutionalization of the mentally ill, agreeing with many of its claims but ultimately disagreeing with its conclusion. Longer summary

Scott reviews Clayton Cramer's book 'My Brother Ron', which argues against deinstitutionalization of the mentally ill. The book traces the history of mental health care in America, from colonial times through the rise of large institutions and their subsequent closure. While Scott agrees with many of Cramer's empirical claims about problems faced by deinstitutionalized mentally ill people, he ultimately disagrees with Cramer's conclusion that reinstitutionalization is needed. Scott argues for alternatives like involuntary outpatient commitment that preserve more freedom for the mentally ill while still providing treatment. Shorter summary

Scott Alexander argues that the right to waive one's rights can be beneficial, using examples from psychiatry and game theory to illustrate his point. Longer summary

Scott Alexander discusses the tension between protecting individuals from exploitative contracts and maintaining the freedom to enter into voluntary agreements. He argues that restrictions on contracts, while sometimes necessary, can have unintended negative consequences. Using his experience as a psychiatrist, he illustrates how the inability to waive certain rights can lead to worse outcomes for patients. He suggests that the ability to waive rights can actually be a form of empowerment, allowing individuals to make decisions that best suit their unique circumstances. The post concludes by drawing parallels to game theory, suggesting that the ability to limit one's options can sometimes be strategically advantageous. Shorter summary