Scott responds to three concerns about embryo selection: embryo personhood rights, loss of trait diversity, and the ethics of preventing disabilities, arguing that none of these objections are fatal to the technology. Longer summary

Scott Alexander responds to three major concerns about embryo selection raised in response to a previous post. First, he addresses whether embryos have personhood rights, arguing that embryos lack the qualities (consciousness, intelligence, etc) that make humans morally valuable. He refutes various counterarguments about potential personhood and responds to edge cases like sleeping hermits. Second, he discusses concerns about trait diversity, arguing that the technology's limited power and slow adoption mean diversity concerns are premature. Third, he addresses the ethics of telling disabled people you'd prefer they didn't exist, comparing it to other situations where we try to prevent certain conditions without devaluing existing people. Shorter summary

A review of 'Two Arms and a Head', a paraplegic's memoir and argument for physician-assisted suicide, exploring the book's content and the broader debate around Medical Assistance in Dying. Longer summary

This review examines 'Two Arms and a Head', a memoir and suicide note written by Clayton Schwartz, a philosophy student who became paraplegic after a motorcycle accident. The book details the physical and emotional devastation of paraplegia, argues for the legalization of physician-assisted suicide, and criticizes society's approach to disability. The review also explores the current state of Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) and the arguments against it from disability rights organizations. Shorter summary

Scott Alexander reviews comments on his critique of the Social Model of Disability, considering defenses, real-world usage, and alternative perspectives. Longer summary

Scott Alexander reviews comments on his post criticizing the Social Model of Disability, highlighting arguments defending the model, discussing its real-world usage, and exploring other perspectives on disability and accommodation. Shorter summary

Scott Alexander explores the complex ethical and legal issues surrounding sexual consent for institutionalized and intellectually disabled individuals, arguing for a nuanced approach that balances protection and autonomy. Longer summary

Scott Alexander discusses the complex issue of consent for institutionalized and intellectually disabled individuals, particularly regarding sexual activity. He explores the tension between protecting vulnerable people from abuse and respecting their autonomy and human desires. The post examines current practices in mental hospitals, long-term care facilities, and legal cases involving disabled individuals. Scott argues that while strict legal protections are necessary, there may be ethical grounds for a more nuanced approach in certain situations, allowing for non-verbal forms of consent and considering the overall well-being of the individuals involved. He critiques both overly restrictive policies and potentially exploitative ones, advocating for a careful, case-by-case consideration of these sensitive issues. Shorter summary

Scott Alexander critiques the autism rights movement's opposition to curing autism, arguing that severe cases cause immense suffering that justifies continued research into cures. Longer summary

Scott Alexander discusses the autism rights movement and their opposition to curing autism. While supporting most of their work, he disagrees with the stance against cures. He argues that severe autism causes immense suffering that cannot be alleviated solely through better treatment, and that research into cures should continue. He acknowledges the benefits autism can bring, but believes the costs outweigh them for many individuals. The post examines outcomes for autistic adults, issues with institutionalization, and ethical considerations around curing or preventing autism. Shorter summary

Scott Alexander debunks a misleading Facebook meme about Google autocomplete suggestions for disabled people, showing that Google's suggestions are universally negative for almost all groups. Longer summary

Scott Alexander critiques a viral Facebook meme about Google autocomplete suggestions for 'disabled people should...', finding it misleading. He demonstrates that Google's autocomplete suggestions are universally negative for almost all demographic groups, not just disabled people. Scott shows how many of the search results are actually denouncing the negative statements, not supporting them. He explores Google's autocomplete suggestions for various groups, finding they often suggest death or extermination, regardless of the group. The post ends with a humorous note about Google's 'Don't Be Evil' motto contrasting with these misanthropic autocomplete results. Shorter summary