Scott satirically proposes and 'proves' that morality is a form of gravity, using pseudo-scientific reasoning and calculations. Longer summary

This satirical post humorously proposes that morality is a form of gravity, using pseudo-scientific reasoning to 'prove' this theory. Scott starts by noting how gravitational language is used in moral discourse, then applies an inverse square law to moral obligations based on distance. He 'confirms' this theory by comparing charitable giving to Africa with the theory's predictions, and calculates the exact distance one needs to be from a beggar to avoid feeling guilty. The post uses a mix of real data and absurd logic to parody certain types of scientific and philosophical arguments. Shorter summary

Scott criticizes the approach to mysticism popularized by Robert Anton Wilson, arguing it provides false rewards and promotes harmful dabbling instead of genuine practice. Longer summary

Scott reflects on his past interest in Robert Anton Wilson's writings and mysticism in general, comparing it to his high school fascination with physics. He argues that learning about mysticism is different from actually practicing it, much like reading about physics isn't the same as doing physics. Scott identifies three main problems with the Anton-Wilson approach to mysticism: it provides a false sense of reward, encourages conspiracy thinking, and promotes harmful dabbling. He concludes that if he were to pursue mysticism again, he would focus on practicing one tradition at a time, avoiding the temptation to mix different approaches or read extensively about mysticism without actually doing it. Shorter summary