Scott examines why early Christianity's strategy of unconditional cooperation succeeded despite game theory predicting it should fail, and explores what this means for modern moral strategies. Longer summary

Scott explores the paradox of early Christianity's success despite following a COOPERATE-BOT strategy (always cooperate, even with enemies) rather than the game-theoretically optimal TIT-FOR-TAT strategy (cooperate first, then mirror opponent's last move). He analyzes historical examples like the Quakers and compares them to modern liberalism, then presents several theories for why COOPERATE-BOT might sometimes succeed against expectations. While he remains personally skeptical of fully embracing COOPERATE-BOT, he notes that history seems to favor extremely cooperative strategies more than game theory would predict. Shorter summary