Scott argues the real distinction in psychology isn't between subfields but between settled science (like dopamine, brain localization, heritability) and breaking-news research, defending psychology's solid core against critics who conflate bad recent studies with the entire field. Longer summary

Scott clarifies his previous post on psychology research, explaining that the key distinction isn't between social psychology and other subfields, but between settled science and novel research. He lists ten examples of well-established psychological findings (like dopamine's role in reinforcement learning, brain localization, heritability studies) that are fundamentally different from flashy new studies that often fail to replicate. Drawing on Eliezer Yudkowsky's concept of 'The Beauty of Settled Science,' he argues that psychology's core knowledge is solid and valuable, even if recent clickbait studies are often wrong. He addresses two types of critics: those who genuinely can't distinguish good from bad psychology (to whom he says the distinction is actually obvious), and those deliberately discrediting all psychology for political reasons (which he argues is counterproductive propaganda). Shorter summary

Scott Alexander reviews a book on Internal Family Systems therapy that controversially claims some mental health issues are caused by literal demons. Longer summary

Scott Alexander reviews 'The Others Within Us', a book by Robert Falconer about Internal Family Systems therapy and its controversial approach to dealing with 'demons' or malevolent spiritual entities in patients' minds. The review explores the book's claims, the history of IFS therapy, and the potential implications of treating mental health issues as spiritual possession, while also providing a skeptical, materialist interpretation of the phenomena described. Shorter summary

Scott Alexander reviews comments on his critique of the Social Model of Disability, considering defenses, real-world usage, and alternative perspectives. Longer summary

Scott Alexander reviews comments on his post criticizing the Social Model of Disability, highlighting arguments defending the model, discussing its real-world usage, and exploring other perspectives on disability and accommodation. Shorter summary

Scott Alexander shares a diverse collection of links and news items, covering topics from architecture and history to AI developments and scientific studies, with brief commentary on many items. Longer summary

This post is a collection of various links and news items curated by Scott Alexander. It covers a wide range of topics including architecture, history, animal welfare, optical illusions, scientific studies, AI developments, demographics, and more. Scott provides brief commentary on many of the items, sometimes expressing his personal opinions or highlighting interesting aspects. The post includes both light-hearted topics (like unusual baby names) and more serious discussions (such as AI safety concerns and research on gender bias in academia). Shorter summary

Scott Alexander explores various COVID-19 topics including lockdown effectiveness, infection rate variations, transmission risks, prediction markets, and ethical considerations of pandemic response. Longer summary

This post covers various aspects of the COVID-19 pandemic, including lockdown effectiveness, heterogeneity in infection rates across countries, transmission risks, prediction markets, and ethical considerations. Scott discusses cell phone data showing limited impact of official lockdowns, explores reasons for varying infection/mortality rates between countries, and highlights the role of speaking/singing in virus transmission. He also examines coronavirus prediction markets, questions the long-term sustainability of lockdowns, and ponders how to quantify the severity of COVID-19 deaths compared to other causes. The post concludes with numerous short updates and links on coronavirus-related topics. Shorter summary